Blood Test Predicts our Time of Death
74Coming to the UK soon is a blood test that will tell Brits their best before dates. And before long, we will all be able to know when we are destined for our date with death or, more mundanely, date of death! The blood test that makes the prediction measures something called telomeres. (Telomeres are a DNA structure that controls the longevity of dividing cells.) The specific test developed by the Spanish determines the speed that we are aging by the length of our telomere – the shorter it is, the more quickly we are aging. Our physical age is not necessarily the same as our chronological one; our blood might reveal that our bodies have matured faster than we would have liked or, perhaps, happily, it may reveal our bodies are more youthful than our years! The test reveals our physical age and will cost just over $700 – and there is bound to be a market for it.
The only reason that it's not already available in the US is because the Spanish group that developed the test is still seeking approval in countries in both Europe and North America. However, the news that the test is available has already sparked lively debate prior to its arrival.
Not everyone greets new discoveries in medicine with applause, and this is one of those advances that is not without its critics. There are a number of ethical questions. For instance, what about insurance companies? If they either knew of our results or were able to insist on having a test, both life and health premiums could be affected dramatically unless they are prohibited by legislation.
And the prediction of death at an early age might actually hasten the day if we are unfortunate enough to process this news through a pessimistic and fatalistic prism. We might decide to have those extra drinks, cigarettes or french fries because, well, “What the hell, I'm going to die early anyway.” Or the news might fill us with feelings of despondency and our days will be filled with gloom until our early graves.
On the other hand, knowing the time of our approximate death will have many advantages in financial matters, for instance. I might decide I can forgo any financial planning and saving for my retirement if the test reveals I will probably die early, (although I might find it difficult to buy life insurance as a result of the test!)
Others have pointed out, the blood test might persuade some of us to make dramatic changes in our lifestyles in order to mitigate some of those factors that accounted for the results. A study published in 2008 in The Lancet showed that major lifestyle changes could prevent premature cell death and extend life.
Knowing our physiological age before a disease appears does give us a chance to adjust our lifestyles. And there is encouraging news, particularly as a result of a study of a number of men identified with a low-risk prostate cancer. After three months of learning techniques to deal with stress, proper diet, exercise and all those other well known but rarely practiced canards for healthy living, the researchers found that telomeres in the subjects had increased by 29% and their bad cholesterol had decreased! However, some could make the case that we should not need warnings of premature death to persuade us to live more healthy lifestyles.
Whether we take the test or not when it becomes available, it does seem that we have a real choice in deciding how long we will live. If we make all the healthy lifestyle decisions, we will live longer – possibly a great deal longer than if we do not. And this advise is a lot cheaper than 700 bucks!
CommentsLoading...
Agree with Seeker7, very interesting Hub. Good write lobonorth. I'll bet though there are plenty of 90 somethings with short telomeres. Wonder how many will be lining up in the U.K. for the test? Keep us updated if you will.
Lobonorth, thanks for an interesting hub about a controversial issue. Isn't it amazing how man has evolved almost to a god like creature? Soon we will be able to affect and orchestrate just about anything on our planet. The only thing we can't stop is our own downfall. I especially loved your final comment that we can save ourselves the 700 bucks by making healthy lifestyle decisions. How true! I totally agree with you that many people getting bad news would further abuse their body and eat, drink and smoke themselves to death. That's mankind. Scientists should rather invent something that makes us less stupid!I would definitely invest 700 bucks in that.
Lobonorth, I just learnt a new word "juxtaposition".
Sage - interesting use of an old word. Man only thinks he has become 'God-like' - and it isn't where all the Babel came from in the first place. Until we respect all life, we will always be in trouble, no matter how long we live.
voted up
q
Very interesting.












Seeker7 Level 8 Commenter 12 months ago
Hi Lobo.
Fascinating Hub - the argument over the 'ethics' is also interesting. On the pessimistic side, I think if insurance companies find out a way to save or make money with this, then they'll be the first to do it.
I also wondered if there was any error margin with these tests. The reason I ask is that a couple of years back there were women who were diagnosed with cervical cancer, but this turned out to be a mistake. And two women who did have cervical cancer were not caught in time and went onto to develop other tumours - fortunately both came through it ok. So I wondered, if there is a margin of error with the blood test, the consequences of a mistake could be traumatic for the people concerned.
I'm not sure either I would want to pay £300+ to know when I'm going to meet the grim reaper. I'd rather spend my cash on trying to improve what I can in life.